Product Business is Very Different from Services

What is the difference between software services and products? Why is it important for India to be developing products?

First Invest, and Then Reap

The business cycle in a services company starts with sales, and ends with project or product delivery. On the other hand, a product company must first invest in building the solution. Then begins a long and complex business cycle to sell, support and continuously evolve the product. This reversal of sales and engineering sequence has a profound impact on how product organizations get built.

Services industry provides manpower to build software apps and products, which belong to the customer. Typically, IT departments of retail, manufacturing, financial, insurance and other businesses require new applications, or enhancements to existing ones, for in-house use. They turn to Indian companies for design and implementation. Needing long-term support, global product companies establish extension engineering teams at Indian subsidiaries or services companies.

In services, clients own the Intellectual Property (IP). All gains (cost savings, productivity improvements, revenue) and risks are entirely the clients’. The service provider gets paid in proportion to the cost of development, irrespective of whether the pricing model is fixed cost or time and material (T&M).

This means that the services revenue growth is directly linked to number of engineers. The industry’s competitiveness is determined by cost of engineers. But the number of trained software engineers in India, cannot scale indefinitely. Even today, good talent is becoming scarce. Salaries are rising to a point where low-cost economies such as China, Vietnam and Philippines have started to compete. Nevertheless, superior talent, project management expertise, processes, and English language skills continue to provide an edge to India. However, others are catching up, thereby causing a slowdown in the industry’s growth rate.

In comparison, products have the potential to fetch non-linear revenue. A product business creates intellectual property. Once developed, the same solution is sold repeatedly to a large number of buyers.

The graph above shows the famed hockey stick revenue model for a successful product company. A services organization can have positive revenue from day one, and grow very quickly too, but the headcount-centric model will eventually become a drag.

Reprinted from From Entrepreneurs to Leaders by permission of Tata McGraw-Hill Education Private Limited. 

About the author

Shirish Deodhar
  • Smita

    Is your think tank focused on creating India’s own iconic products? I have been pointing out for years that our IT industry should not be content to serve as handmaidens of others. I am glad for your initiative and would like to learn more about your objectives. my contact: smitapurushottam@gmail.com

  • Dh Ja

    It is also easier

  • Good point. Another thing to notice is that products have a lifecycle, and you need to keep building new products to maintain growth. Services can continue as long as there is a need, and no disruptive innovation appears.

  • Rahul Mulay

    Shirish, there is one more difference – technical resources working in product development have different attributes from those working in services.

  • Nick

    Great Article…loved it thoroughly.

  • Vinod Ganjoo

    Nicely written article, also since the product business is not headcount-centric the product can evolve using the existing resources and can lead to long term non linear revenues.

  • Would like to bring out another important difference – higher upfront capital requirements in a product businesses. Since the product development process requires significant time and resources, and the revenues build up only over a period of time, the business requires high capital in the initial phase to cover the expenses. However, as pointed out products business have the potential to grow revenues in a non-linear fashion and also have superior margins after a critical size, the cash flow generation tends to be very large as well over time.

  • rat

    Excellent Article. An important distinction explained lucidly.

  • Hari

    Good

    The bottom line is quick revenue generation. And with quick change of
    CxO across I.T companies (most of them with limited understanding of products)
    it becomes difficult to understand the real difference. Kudos . This is
    an eye-opener for thse CxOs. Wl done.
    Hari

  • KrishnaKumar

    There is a bit of that ‘hockey-stick’ graph even for Services. Imagine if you are setting up a new services company. You would need to invest, unless you are starting up as a one-man show.

  • Ravishankar

    Have seen this article reposted on linkedin
    Utilization of resource & investment may be different in a product and service business cycles, but the sequence remains same ‘first invest, and then reap’. Products are necessary for the service industry to survive but their business focus is different and so are their investment and revenue model. Services companies do thrives on manpower, but the training has to be facilitated by the product owner. Though the client own the IP, the ‘skill’ will however remain with the service company. Indian companies will be in demand till they are able to leverage this. If India’s economic-advantage gets sold as the only edge, then low cost countries can be seen as competition. Sustainably will be at stake both for product and service companies if they see innovation as a challenge.
    When we talk about apps, new applications or enhancements we also talk about service contracts and cost attached. Cost of production get reduced considerably when a fixed price model is bid. This way the risk does not remain with the client but gets shared along with cost. Thus, service and product businesses complement each other. Because of multiple service cycles in a product life cycle, service gets paid even before the product reaches its final stage hence the revenue grows faster here. Yes, traditional headcount model may not attract business any more. Nonlinear growth initiative triggered by TCS may take lead with TCS BaNCS. Other will follow.

  • KK

    Good starting point! However, things arent that simple!
    Services company cant do a JIT recruitment either – a BENCH is a heavy up-front investment. Hence, it is not sales first and then invest!
    A product company’s investment isnt complete when a product is ready, there is a constant need to update, upgrade and that costs money too!
    Agree that revenue in services companies tends to be linear!